Understanding
Visual hierarchy, labels, navigation and cues that help visitors understand where they are.
SaaSCheckup ties every UX signal to a page, interaction and piece of evidence. Unmeasured opinions, intent and behavior remain explicitly unknown.
The assessment covers what can be reproduced within the public or explicitly authorized scope.
Visual hierarchy, labels, navigation and cues that help visitors understand where they are.
Responsive behavior, keyboard use, controls, forms and visible messages in authorized public journeys.
Semantics, accessible names and automatable signals without claiming to replace a complete human WCAG audit.
Each area separates confirmed failure, review signal and untested item.
Broken links, ambiguous destinations and interrupted public journeys.
Viewport, visible overflow and controls that are difficult to use on small screens.
Observable focus and access to sampled interactions.
Labels, input types, required hints and non-destructive public submission behavior.
Headings, main regions, image alternatives and control names.
Anything requiring user research, product analytics or authenticated access remains NOT TESTED.
The report describes possible friction and how to verify it. Only your product data can establish the real effect on activation, retention or conversion.
Reproduced and recorded observation.
Cause or impact to confirm with source and users.
A precise criterion for checking the fix.
No. The audit measures observable signals. It does not replace interviews, product research or tests with your users.
Only pages and interactions actually reachable within the authorized scope. Exact coverage is shown in the report.
Confirmed failures are ranked by technical severity and likely friction without inventing financial impact.
Each guide addresses a distinct intent and points to the relevant method or diagnosis.